I use DSPAM 3.x-3.8 for several years, and it work very well for US ASCII mails. But it seems as its accuracy decrease for mails written in national languages - and number of these mails continually increase. I think about two factors which may come into question:
1) different national encodings used for single countries (e.g. in my Czech rep. there are three major /UTF-8, ISO8859-2, cp1250/ encodings and several other minor; in other countries situation may be similar). 2) MIME extensions as defined in RFC 1341/1342/1521/1522/maybe-other allows encode arbitrary 8-bit text as Base64 or Quoted-printable. It seems spammers now exploits this technique also even for US ASCII written spams, evidently for reasons that these spams are worse detected. My question is: cope DSPAM with these pitfalls (e.g. by encoding MIME parts, then encoding text to common platform (utf-8?), and destination strings are then taken as source for DSPAM operations)? Thanks, Franta Hanzlik ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time to move off Lotus Notes and onto the cloud with Force.com, apps are easier to build, use, and manage than apps on traditional platforms. Sign up for the Lotus Notes Migration Kit to learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/salesforce-d2d _______________________________________________ Dspam-devel mailing list Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel
