On 22/08/2012 23:44, Tom Hendrikx wrote :
The CHANGELOG says one thing about postgresql between 3.10.1 and 3.10.2: [20110930:2055] sbajic: Remove support for PostgreSQL< 8.1.0 (EOL)
Yep, that's what I saw and why I decided to remain with 3.10.1
Unfortunately this does not describe the fact that this change also
included (improved) support for postgresql 9.1
So if dspam + postgresql give query errors, then either:
- use dspam 3.10.2 + postgres 9.1
- use dspam 3.10.1 + postgres<=9.0
- modify postgres 9.1 postgresql.conf:
set standard_conforming_strings=off
Also see:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=29635988
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/runtime-config-compatible.html
Tom you're unvaluable ! I'm pretty confident that this is part of my
problem.
Thank you so much. I'm gonna upgrade to 3.10.2 immediatly. Best regards. Christophe Garault
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________ Dspam-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel
