On 07.01.2013 22:23, Tom Hendrikx wrote: > On 07-01-13 20:34, Tod A. Sandman wrote: >>> Did the patch you submitted get merged in the official dspam.cgi? >>> >> I never received a reply, so I assume not. >> > Hi Hello,
> It's not that we are ungrateful, just the fact that there are not many > developers actively working on DSPAM. Another problem is that I don't > know perl very well, so I am in no position to really verify that patch > does not introduce weird behaviour or security issues. I will do it in the next days. > @Troy: If you can test Tods patch and see if it does what it's supposed > to fix, we have at least 2 persons vouching for the patch. > > Kind regards, > Tom -- Kind Regards from Switzerland, Stevan Bajić > _______________________________________________ > Dspam-devel mailing list > Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412 _______________________________________________ Dspam-devel mailing list Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel
