On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:58:18PM -0700, David Rees wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:13 PM, k...@rice.edu <k...@rice.edu> wrote: > > We have it working here with dspam-3.10.2 and postgresql-9.2.4. > > Interesting - what OS are you running? I wonder if it may be because I > don't have dspam linked against the same version of PostgreSQL. I have > two systems, one a CentOS 6 system where dspam is linked against the > OS provided pg libs (8.4) and another Fedora 17 system where dspam is > linked against a self-compiled pg 9.0... > > Maybe I'll try recompiling dspam against pg 9.2 and see what happens... > > -Dave >
We are running on a RHEL 6.3 and using a locally built dspam to allow access to some internal errors via STDERR that the current source does not include. But I do not recall having any problems training with the pre-built packages. Cheers, Ken ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Dspam-devel mailing list Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel
