Hi TOm, Though I also love the DSPAMdesign and mechanism(s), spamassasin with it's filters have been a de facto mail filter that almost everybody uses, and that adds to DSPAM's "unknown" status and being forgotten by mail administrators ;(
Sorry to see another good project wither away :( Hendrik On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Tom Hendrikx <t...@whyscream.net> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > > Hello DSPAM community, > > After a few years of being active in the DSPAM community, I've decided > to leave the project. Unlike others who silently stopped responding to > mails and other inquiries, I'm documenting my reasons in the hopes > that it might be of help/interest to others. > > When I actively joined the DSPAM project, it was in need of some new > blood that helped out on development and other tasks, after most of > the original participants of the community takeover from Sensory > Networks somehow silently abandoned the project for reasons unknown > (to me). > > After being active for a few years, I think I've seen most of the > problems in the DSPAM project, and tried to address a few without > result. The main issues I learned are listed below. > > 1. No active development > - ------------------------ > There is no one working on the DSPAM code. There are numerous bug > reports and feature requests that could be addressed, and some parts > in DSPAM have been ripe for refactoring or rewriting for a long time, > but nobody is putting any effort into it. There is currently only one > developer 'active' within the project, but you rarely see activity > from this person. > The most code changes in the last 2(?) years are from patches > contributed through debian bugreports (thank you, debian maintainer). > The fact that no one within the project is actively working on the > code, creates a sort of chicken-or-egg problem: without existing > activity, no major outside contributions can be expected, since no one > is interested in becoming the new sole responsible developer in the > project. > > 2. No value seen in making DSPAM more transparent > - ------------------------------------------------- > On several occasions I've raised my voice on making DSPAM more usable > to new users, for instance by making error messages more informative, > or adding logging of normal operation (i.e. non-errors) so people get > a better hang of the product. Changes like this don't 'improve' DSPAM > filtering, but the they do make the software easier to use, and its > operation more transparent to new and experienced users. > Finding issues in software is easier when you actually understand what > it's trying to do, which in turn could result in more active users, > more useful bug reports, possible more contributed patches and in the > end maybe even more developers. > Right now DSPAM acts like a sort of black box for anyone not familiar > with the source code, and that discourages investigation of odd > behavior, which could be any of: configuration errors, bugs or missing > (but expected) features. > > 3. No drive on changing the status quo > - -------------------------------------- > The situation that DSPAM is in right now, a sort of dormant or zombie > (not dead but far from alive) status, is not good. It doesn't attract > new users, it doesn't attract new developers, actually it only only > supports existing, experienced users. Nobody in the community, both in > the project maintainers as in the users community, seems to be > interested in changing that. > Based on my observations, that seems that people seem to think that > DSPAM is either feature-complete and bug-free, or they just lack the > motivation/energy/time/whatever to contribute anything. > > Because I care about DSPAM, in the years I've active within the > project all of these issues have bothered me multiple times. I've > tried to address stuff that I could address, or tried to raise > awareness for other things. I didn't get much done though. > - From this I can only conclude that DSPAM is a sort of dead project. > Just like I wouldn't like to get myself (or my company, for instance) > depending on a piece of software in this state, I think that nobody > should get the impression that DSPAM is supported by an active > community, when that support actually never goes beyond answering easy > questions on the users mailing list. > > Therefore I'm resigning as DSPAM release manager, and will remove > myself as project admin from the sourceforge project. I hope others > will take up responsibility for the work I leave behind (and > unattended tasks listed above, or any tasks I didn't point out), so > maybe DPAM will become an active project in the future. > > Kind regards, > Tom Hendrikx > > > PS: I tried to address some of the issues listed above (logging of > regular operation, transparent code (including documentation), easier > ways of contribution) outside of the DSPAM code base itself, which > finally resulted in dspam-milter[1]. I'll continue to develop and > support that software, probably until I'll stop using DSPAM myself. If > I would ever abandon the project, proper notice (just like this one) > will be given. > > [1] https://github.com/whyscream/dspam-milter > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1 > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTvUviAAoJEJPfMZ19VO/1rBUQANmP1DCmqUMSJ82QnnfnmeBA > nsZmkijQvdvgvqvaitTWs/KpmtlzeojVpxZlRlvCciigqW9kHR1qgvqRBRl246z9 > NZ6EedGIH8yNJbrRTg+KZrFC6UFfg0H6rcGAnwVZoP8xEW0ysND0plnZmCOolXr9 > uApBJw3yPtgNTA4zMAqSnPcHckIvVXSsPqe8Wfw/4Ko1c8UBTk9dTqxBWTIV9bQQ > W3JgdE1m41ihNbWWX9v6Yf9CQqlsow6NeMmxUe/JcD8dhBW1sggxNlTFH+W0a7tw > 1KFSVb8DLo8fWkhNkWytsGxdOoqzgdnk+FyKjKMfcbba/HyrrgI2Q9VJuRnztwVw > Nv3jCUIEbPsikUfBytfkUK3ex3/MisuFhN8BR+Ei+mi3ELTC4CXDUINbNR4uD2A8 > 9WxoBzW5kkr39Yj+AiXnaNsPUDgFpE7bo8500nqkYoKxEe0/psvacfIjPqF2EslF > mzPU7xjmDeXxwelLWVK8Cr0YHVH0J+pEUxq5jd1+Iy0DD7ySGeIb9Uzu9o69f730 > Wg95v/Ijpea4P9mFQdcYppUm5HwbbYwWfB6eQmg4tkh2zXebRXhnvAxN+N94k03c > VdJaTzxXuX/29TPB5CZ7B7BxhwpXv4Aw8AXHcejn4aeIoHz7JmNi0WO6a/Sy0qFs > noK/MrcJsnh3TPcp9HZT > =lxQ5 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse > Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition > Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows > Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft > _______________________________________________ > Dspam-devel mailing list > Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft _______________________________________________ Dspam-devel mailing list Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel
