But this might also make DSPAM too dependent on what SA things, no?

I.e., maybe you'd be better off letting SA filter the truly obvious  
spam, and then letting DSPAM independently decide for the remaining  
emails.

On Mar 20, 2009, at 2:58 PM, Yan Seiner wrote:

>
> On Fri, March 20, 2009 10:43 am, Chris Ryland wrote:
>> Interesting--can you elaborate just a bit?
>
> OK, first mail passes through SA.  I have it configured to only add  
> info
> in the X- headers.
>
> Then the mail passes through dspam.  dspam uses the info in SA's X  
> headers
> as tokens in its decision.  So your email has the following headers:
>
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on  
> selene.seiner.lan
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
>     DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX autolearn=no version=3.2.5
> X-DSPAM-Check: by www.seiner.com on Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:08:38 -0700
> X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
> X-DSPAM-Processed: Fri Mar 20 11:08:39 2009
> X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9995
> X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000
> X-DSPAM-Signature: 49c3dba742621804284693
> X-DSPAM-Factors: 27,
>     Cc*lists.sourceforge.net, 0.00010,
>     wrote+>>, 0.00010,
>     On+Fri, 0.00010,
>     Subject*user], 0.00010,
>     as+>, 0.00011,
>>> +>>, 0.00013,
>     wrote+>, 0.00015,
>> +On, 0.00017,
>     Cc*user, 0.00021,
>     the+>, 0.00022,
>     References*mail.gmail.com>, 0.00023,
>     References*mail.gmail.com>, 0.00023,
>     same+>, 0.00024,
>     Cc*user+lists.sourceforge.net, 0.00024,
>> +I, 0.00026,
>> +>, 0.00026,
>> +>, 0.00026,
>     X-Mailer*Mail+(2.930.3), 0.00048,
>     X-Mailer*(2.930.3), 0.00048,
>     Mime-Version*v930.3), 0.00049,
>     Mime-Version*framework+v930.3), 0.00049,
>     References*www.datavault.us>, 0.00052,
>> +Yan, 0.00053,
>>> +Can, 0.00058,
>> +the, 0.00061,
>     38+PM, 0.00067,
>     From*Chris, 0.00092
>
> Now let's look at a piece of junk:
>
> X-Spam-Flag: YES
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on  
> selene.seiner.lan
> X-Spam-Level: ***********
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=11.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_99,
>      
> HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04 
> ,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,RCVD_IN_XBL,URIBL_JP_SURBL,
>     URIBL_RHS_DOB autolearn=no version=3.2.5
> X-Spam-Report:
>     * 1.5 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL  
> blocklist
>     * [URIs: batiaceo.org]
>     * 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
>     * [score: 1.0000]
>     * 0.2 HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04 BODY: HTML has a low ratio of text to  
> image
> area
>     * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
>     * 1.5 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
>     * 3.0 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
>     * [64.18.137.4 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
>     * 1.1 URIBL_RHS_DOB Contains an URI of a new domain (Day Old  
> Bread)
>     * [URIs: batiaceo.org]
>     * 0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
> X-DSPAM-Check: by www.seiner.com on Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:42:38 -0700
> X-DSPAM-Result: Spam
> X-DSPAM-Processed: Fri Mar 20 11:42:39 2009
> X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9997
> X-DSPAM-Probability: 1.0000
> X-DSPAM-Signature: 49c3e39f74883847820380
> X-DSPAM-Factors: 15,
>     X-Spam-Report*[URIs, 0.99990,
>     X-Spam-Report*URL, 0.99990,
>     X-Spam-Report*URL+listed, 0.99990,
>     X-Spam-Report*1.5+URIBL_JP_SURBL, 0.99990,
>     X-Spam-Report*URIBL_JP_SURBL, 0.99990,
>     X-Spam-Report*URI+of, 0.99990,
>     X-Spam-Report*an+URI, 0.99990,
>     jpg"/>, 0.99990,
>     X-Spam-Report*the, 0.99990,
>     X-Spam-Report*3.5, 0.99990,
>     X-Spam-Report*the+JP, 0.99990,
>     X-Spam-Report*URIBL_JP_SURBL+Contains, 0.99990,
>     X-Spam-Report*3.5+BAYES_99, 0.99990,
>     X-Spam-Report*MIME_HTML_ONLY, 0.99990,
>     X-Spam-Report*RCVD_IN_XBL+RBL, 0.99990
>
> you can see that almost all the tokens dspam used came from the X-Spam
> headers.
>
> --Yan
>
>>
>> On Mar 20, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Yan Seiner wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, March 20, 2009 9:55 am, Chris Ryland wrote:
>>>> Very interesting, thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Can I ask what SpamAssassin adds to the mix?
>>>
>>> I use SA as input to dspam.  It allows dspam to be more accurate as
>>> the
>>> header tokens are nearly always the same.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Yan Seiner, PE
>>>
>>> Support my bid for the 4J School Board
>>> http://www.seiner.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Cheers!
>> --Chris Ryland / Em Software, Inc. / www.emsoftware.com
>>
>>
>> !DSPAM:49c3dba742621804284693!
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Yan Seiner, PE
>
> Support my bid for the 4J School Board
> http://www.seiner.com
>
>

Cheers!
--Chris Ryland / Em Software, Inc. / www.emsoftware.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
_______________________________________________
Dspam-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user

Reply via email to