alexus wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 5:26 AM, Hugo Monteiro <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>   
>> alexus wrote:
>>     
>>> Apr 16 04:11:26 mx1 dspam[77779]: No such feature 'chained'
>>> Apr 16 04:11:26 mx1 dspam[77779]: Unable to attach DSPAM context
>>> Apr 16 04:11:26 mx1 dspam[77779]: process_message returned error -2.
>>> delivering.
>>>
>>> I'm getting these messages in my /var/log/maillog
>>>
>>> and on top of that, instead of what it reffers to be "deliverying" I
>>> only get this
>>>
>>> Return-Path: <[email protected]>
>>> Delivered-To: [email protected]
>>> Received: (qmail 77796 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2009 04:11:40 -0000
>>> Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 77790, pid: 77791, t: 0.0229s
>>>         scanners: regex: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.95/m:50/d:9244 spam: 3.2.5
>>>
>>> and this is my full email, I just have few lines of headers, without
>>> even rest of headers nor body of email is MIA
>>>
>>> someone please help
>>> thanks in advance
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> Hello Alexus,
>>
>>
>> From the UPGRADING file, on 3.8.0 source distribution, you'll see something
>> like:
>>
>> --- snip ---
>>
>> UPGRADING FROM 3.6
>> ------------------
>>
>> 1. Add 'Tokenizer' setting to dspam.conf
>>  The 'Tokenizer' setting in 3.8.0 replaces tokenizer definitions in the
>>  "Feature" clause of previous version configurations. See src/dspam.conf
>>  (after make) for more information about this seting.
>>
>> --- snip ---
>>
>>
>> So, where you would have Feature chained, prior to 3.8.0, you should now
>> have Tokenizer chained.
>>
>> Has for the crippled messages... if you set spam=no in your simcontrol file,
>> i.e. disable dspam call, do you still observe the same? (don't forget to
>> call simscanmk after the changes)
>>
>> Also please let us know how did you ./configure simscan. The way dspam is
>> being called is rather important.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hugo Monteiro.
>>
>> --
>> ci.fct.unl.pt:~# cat .signature
>>
>> Hugo Monteiro
>> Email    : [email protected]
>> Telefone : +351 212948300 Ext.15307
>> Web      : http://hmonteiro.net
>>
>> Centro de Informática
>> Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da
>>                   Universidade Nova de Lisboa
>> Quinta da Torre   2829-516 Caparica   Portugal
>> Telefone: +351 212948596   Fax: +351 212948548
>> www.ci.fct.unl.pt             [email protected]
>>
>> ci.fct.unl.pt:~# _
>>
>>
>>     
>
> my setup is LWQ type of setup with some minor modifications/tweaks
> here and there
> I also use simscan, i configured simscan with following options
>
> ./configure --enable-per-domain --enable-attach --enable-dspam=n
>   

You have just said that you DON'T want to compile simscan with dspam 
support -> "--enable-dspam=n"

My personal sugestion, for the dspam related options, taking in 
consideration what you have pasted here would be something like the 
following:

--enable-per-domain=y --enable-attach=y --enable-dspam=y 
--enable-dspam-path=/usr/bin/dspam --enable-dspam-user=y 
--enable-dspam-args="--client --deliver=innocent"

> --enable-spam-passthru --enable-spam --enable-spamc-args=-U
> /tmp/spamd.sock --enable-received --enable-regex=y
> CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include/ LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib/
>
> and i configure dspam with following options
>
> ./configure --enable-debug --enable-virtual-users
>   

Also here i would advise you to consider some other options. At least 
the following ones:

--enable-domain-scale --enable-signature-headers --enable-daemon 
--with-storage-driver=hash_drv

> the earlier problem that i've had, which is produced in
> /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current
>
>
> @4000000049e6978a0df9cc04 execve returned -1/13
>
>
> i fixed, by changing permissions for /usr/local/bin/dspam
>
> r...@mx1 /home/vpopmail/domains/8au.net/postmaster/Maildir 571$ ls -la
> /usr/local/bin/dspam
> -r-s--x---  1 simscan  mail  364532 Apr 16 03:29 /usr/local/bin/dspam
> r...@mx1 /home/vpopmail/domains/8au.net/postmaster/Maildir 572$
>
>   

I personally see no point in changing ownership of the dspam binary to 
the user simscan. You can give execution permission to everyone and then 
use the "Trust" directive in dspam.conf to fine tune who has rights to 
act in the name of others, while using the dspam --user switch.

> now I'm facing new problem
>
> Apr 16 04:11:40 mx1 dspam[77792]: No such feature 'chained'
> Apr 16 04:11:40 mx1 dspam[77792]: Unable to attach DSPAM context
> Apr 16 04:11:40 mx1 dspam[77792]: process_message returned error -2.
> delivering.
>
>   

weird to see it complain about feature 'chained' while not having 
anything like that on dspam.conf file.

> this is my dspam.conf
>
> Algorithm graham burton
> AllowOverride enableBNR
> AllowOverride enableWhitelist
> AllowOverride optIn optOut
> AllowOverride showFactors
> AllowOverride signatureLocation
> AllowOverride spamAction spamSubject
> AllowOverride statisticalSedation
> AllowOverride trainingMode
> AllowOverride whitelistThreshold
> Feature whitelist
> HashAutoExtend          on
> HashConnectionCache     10
> HashExtentSize          49157
> HashMaxExtents          0
> HashMaxSeek             10
> HashPctIncrease 10
> HashRecMax              98317
> Home /usr/local/var/dspam
> LocalMX 127.0.0.1
> Notifications   off
> OnFail error
> Opt out
> PValue bcr
> Preference "showFactors=on"
> Preference "signatureLocation=message"  # 'message' or 'headers'
> Preference "spamAction=quarantine"
> ProcessorBias on
> ProcessorURLContext on
> PurgeHapaxes    30          # Tokens with less than 5 hits (hapaxes)
> PurgeHits1I     15          # Tokens with only 1 innocent hit
> PurgeHits1S     15          # Tokens with only 1 spam hit
> PurgeNeutral    90          # Tokens with neutralish probabilities
> PurgeSignatures 14          # Stale signatures
> PurgeUnused     90          # Unused tokens
> StorageDriver /usr/local/lib/libhash_drv.so
> SystemLog on
> TestConditionalTraining on
> Tokenizer word
> TrainingMode teft
> Trust daemon
> Trust mail
> Trust mailnull
> Trust qmaild
> Trust root
> Trust smmsp
> TrustedDeliveryAgent "/usr/libexec/mail.local"
> UserLog   on
> WebStats on
>
>   

I had no knowledge of a "word" tokenizer. I've only heared of the following:

chained
noise
tb
whitelist
sbph

Where is that option documented?

(Hint: try replacing Tokenizer word for Tokenizer chained and add 
Tokenizer whitelist while you're at it)

Regards,

Hugo Monteiro.

-- 
ci.fct.unl.pt:~# cat .signature

Hugo Monteiro
Email    : [email protected]
Telefone : +351 212948300 Ext.15307
Web      : http://hmonteiro.net

Centro de Informática
Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da
                   Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Quinta da Torre   2829-516 Caparica   Portugal
Telefone: +351 212948596   Fax: +351 212948548
www.ci.fct.unl.pt             [email protected]

ci.fct.unl.pt:~# _


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and 
around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
$200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco.
300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. 
Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p
_______________________________________________
Dspam-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user

Reply via email to