Le lundi 10 août 2009 à 22:51 +0200, Steve a écrit : > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > > Datum: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:16:25 +0200 > > Von: Julien Valroff <[email protected]> > > An: Steve <[email protected]> > > CC: [email protected] > > Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] Dspam errors. > > > Le lundi 10 août 2009 à 10:28 +0200, Steve a écrit : > > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > > > > Datum: Sun, 09 Aug 2009 19:14:09 +0200 > > > > Von: Julien Valroff <[email protected]> > > > > An: Steve <[email protected]> > > > > CC: [email protected] > > > > Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] Dspam errors. > > > > > > > Hi Steve, > > > > > > > > Sorry for the late answer, I wanted to work on this quitely. > > > > > > > > Le vendredi 31 juillet 2009 à 21:46 +0200, Steve a écrit : > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > > > > Postfix needs to know it is a valid user before accepting the > > email, > > > > > > hence either one of virtual_mailbox_maps or virtual_alias_maps > > should > > > > > > return a valid user. I hence understand it is correct to specify > > the > > > > > > aliases in the postfix database. > > > > > > > > > > > It is really not needed. Trust me. I have it here and have it > > nowhere > > > > > defined in the virtual mailbox maps nor in the virtual alias maps. > > > > > > > > I think I have now understood why you do not need this whereas I do > > need > > > > it. > > > > I use virtual_mailbox_maps which checks the validity of the recipients > > > > for virtual domains BEFORE accepting and queing the mail. > > > > > > > > I guess you do not use this parameter > > > > > > > I use it. :) > > > > Then, I still do not understand! > > When you test sending a mail to an inexisting virtual user from telnet, > > when is it rejected? > > It should be directly after RCPT TO: > > EHLO domain.com > > 250-mail.kirya.net > > 250-PIPELINING > > 250-SIZE 1073741824 > > 250-VRFY > > 250-ETRN > > 250-STARTTLS > > 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES > > 250-8BITMIME > > 250 DSN > > MAIL FROM: [email protected] > > 250 2.1.0 Ok > > RCPT TO: [email protected] > > 550 5.1.1 <[email protected]>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in > > virtual mailbox table > > > If I would test the above on my setup, then I am 100% sure that > Policyd-Weight will kick in and not allow me to send the mail. So I need to > use a MAIL FROM which is valid (from the viewpoint from where I am making the > connection). > > I tried from two systems outside my network and both of them got catched by > policyd-weight. So I can't test this over here. > > > > > If I do not specify dspam@ and ham@ in the virtual mailbox/alias table, > > postfix doesn't accept the mail. > > > That's right if you only have virtual and have disabled all others. > > > > It does however work in local, as it does use the pickup service which > > does not make this extra control. > > > Correct. And what is the problem if you use ham@ spam@ in local? I mean just > ham@ spam@ and nothing else in local. Everything else stays in virtual. > > > > I am really sorry to bother you with this, but I hate not to understand > > something! > > > You do understand it. At least everything above is right. But one can > overwrite the virtual by using local for ham@/s...@.
How? I thought a virtual domain could only be virtual. This is at least what is written in the documentation, but there might be "workarounds" I am not aware of... Cheers, Julien ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
