On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 17:59:25 +0800
Michael Alger <ds...@mm.quex.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 11:23:16PM -0700, Terry Barnum wrote:
> >>> I've been running DSPAM for approximately 2 weeks and looking
> >>> at the output of dspam_stats, I'm curious how long training
> >>> normally takes.
> >>>
> >>> $ cat /usr/local/dspam.conf | grep -v ^# | grep -v ^$
> >>>
> >>> TrainingMode toe
> >>> Preference "trainingMode=TOE"
> 
> Your default settings are TOE mode. Are you overriding this for any
> of the users in their preferences? If not, this would explain why
> it's only learning from errors: because you told it to.
> 
> Try switching this to TUM or TEFT.
> 
I would advise AGAINST going to TEFT. The problem he is describing has not much 
to do with the training mode. Even in TOE the TP/TN counters should increase 
each time he gets a new mail. So something is fishy in his setup. Those TP/TN 
numbers should increase with each inbound mail regardless of the training mode.

-- 
Kind Regards from Switzerland,

Stevan Bajić

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Dspam-user mailing list
Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user

Reply via email to