dspam-user-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>Send Dspam-user mailing list submissions to > dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > dspam-user-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net > >You can reach the person managing the list at > dspam-user-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of Dspam-user digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: get rid of body tag? (Terry Barnum) > 2. Re: get rid of body tag? (Stevan Baji?) > 3. Re: get rid of body tag? (Nathanael Noblet) > 4. Re: get rid of body tag? (Nathanael Noblet) > 5. Re: get rid of body tag? (Terry Barnum) > 6. Re: get rid of body tag? (Stevan Baji?) > 7. Re: get rid of body tag? (Stevan Baji?) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 10:01:37 -0700 >From: Terry Barnum <te...@dop.com> >Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] get rid of body tag? >To: Stevan Baji? <ste...@bajic.ch> >Cc: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net >Message-ID: <1516dec4-bb20-439e-803e-f358c2ec0...@dop.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > >On Apr 2, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Stevan Baji? wrote: > >> That is the wrong place to look for informations. Firstly the source archive >> has the most documentation. The second place is the DSPAM wiki. dspam.sf.net >> is the place to start looking for information. > >Thank you for the correction. > >> That is right too. I think you changed stuff in dspam.conf but it is not >> picking it up. Could it be that you have changed the wrong dspam.conf? Could >> you post the output of "dspam --version"? (I think I asked that already? And >> you have provided that info. Right?). Anyway... please post it again > >$ dspam --version >DSPAM Anti-Spam Suite 3.9.0 (agent/library) > >> and post the location of dspam.conf that you edit. > >/usr/local/etc/dspam.conf > >To see if there are any other dspam.conf's that might be confusing things: > >$ cd /; sudo find . -name dspam.conf -print >./Users/xxxxxx/Downloads/dspam-3.9.0/src/dspam.conf >./usr/local/etc/dspam.conf > >So it looks like there's only one dspam.conf in a working path and that's the >one I'm editing. > >I'm using the mysql driver to store user info if that makes a difference. > >Thanks, >-Terry > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 2 >Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:26:10 +0200 >From: Stevan Baji? <ste...@bajic.ch> >Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] get rid of body tag? >To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net >Message-ID: <20100405202610.02c1ac22.ste...@bajic.ch> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > >On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 10:01:37 -0700 >Terry Barnum <te...@dop.com> wrote: > >> >> On Apr 2, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Stevan Baji? wrote: >> >> > That is the wrong place to look for informations. Firstly the source >> > archive has the most documentation. The second place is the DSPAM wiki. >> > dspam.sf.net is the place to start looking for information. >> >> Thank you for the correction. >> >> > That is right too. I think you changed stuff in dspam.conf but it is not >> > picking it up. Could it be that you have changed the wrong dspam.conf? >> > Could you post the output of "dspam --version"? (I think I asked that >> > already? And you have provided that info. Right?). Anyway... please post >> > it again >> >> $ dspam --version >> DSPAM Anti-Spam Suite 3.9.0 (agent/library) >> >Is this the whole output of "dspam --version"? You should get much more lines >then the one you posted above. Can you post the whole output from "dspam >--version"? > > > >> > and post the location of dspam.conf that you edit. >> >> /usr/local/etc/dspam.conf >> >> To see if there are any other dspam.conf's that might be confusing things: >> >> $ cd /; sudo find . -name dspam.conf -print >> ./Users/xxxxxx/Downloads/dspam-3.9.0/src/dspam.conf >> ./usr/local/etc/dspam.conf >> >> So it looks like there's only one dspam.conf in a working path and that's >> the one I'm editing. >> >> I'm using the mysql driver to store user info if that makes a difference. >> >> Thanks, >> -Terry > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 3 >Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 11:33:00 -0700 >From: Nathanael Noblet <nathan...@gnat.ca> >Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] get rid of body tag? >To: Stevan Baji? <ste...@bajic.ch> >Cc: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net >Message-ID: <b8a4d8e1-75aa-4edb-9da3-04ae1c555...@gnat.ca> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > >On Apr 5, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Stevan Baji? wrote: > >> On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 10:01:37 -0700 >> Terry Barnum <te...@dop.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Apr 2, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Stevan Baji? wrote: >>> >>>> That is the wrong place to look for informations. Firstly the source >>>> archive has the most documentation. The second place is the DSPAM wiki. >>>> dspam.sf.net is the place to start looking for information. >>> >>> Thank you for the correction. >>> >>>> That is right too. I think you changed stuff in dspam.conf but it is not >>>> picking it up. Could it be that you have changed the wrong dspam.conf? >>>> Could you post the output of "dspam --version"? (I think I asked that >>>> already? And you have provided that info. Right?). Anyway... please post >>>> it again >>> >>> $ dspam --version >>> DSPAM Anti-Spam Suite 3.9.0 (agent/library) >>> >> Is this the whole output of "dspam --version"? You should get much more >> lines then the one you posted above. Can you post the whole output from >> "dspam --version"? > > >We should probably find out why that gets removed as if I remember correctly >the Fedora/EPEL versions have the same output... > > > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 4 >Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 11:34:57 -0700 >From: Nathanael Noblet <nathan...@gnat.ca> >Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] get rid of body tag? >To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net >Message-ID: <79cd3d9e-5b85-48e5-bfcd-d01b59bdf...@gnat.ca> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > >On Apr 5, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Nathanael Noblet wrote: >> We should probably find out why that gets removed as if I remember correctly >> the Fedora/EPEL versions have the same output... > >Well now this is odd... I just looked at it again... > >[r...@titanium bugs.gnat.ca]# dspam --version > >DSPAM Anti-Spam Suite 3.9.0 (agent/library) > >Copyright (c) 2002-2009 DSPAM Project >http://dspam.sourceforge.net. > >DSPAM may be copied only under the terms of the GNU General Public License, >a copy of which can be found with the DSPAM distribution kit. > >Configuration parameters: '--build=i386-redhat-linux-gnu' >'--host=i386-redhat-linux-gnu' '--target=i386-redhat-linux-gnu' >'--program-prefix=' '--prefix=/usr' '--exec-prefix=/usr' '--bindir=/usr/bin' >'--sbindir=/usr/sbin' '--datadir=/usr/share' '--includedir=/usr/include' >'--libdir=/usr/lib' '--libexecdir=/usr/libexec' '--localstatedir=/var' >'--sharedstatedir=/usr/com' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' >'--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--enable-long-usernames' '--enable-syslog' >'--enable-large-scale' '--disable-domain-scale' '--disable-homedir' >'--enable-virtual-users' '--enable-preferences-extension' >'--with-mysql-includes=/usr/include/mysql' >'--with-mysql-libraries=/usr/lib/mysql' >'--with-pgsql-includes=/usr/include/pgsql' '--with-pgsql-libraries=/usr/lib' >'--enable-daemon' '--enable-external-lookup' >'--with-storage-driver=hash_drv,mysql_drv,pgsql_drv,sqlite3_drv' >'--with-dspam-home=/var/lib/dspam' '--with-dspam-owner=dspam' >'--with-dspam-group=mail' '--with-dspam-home-group=mail' '--wit > h-dspam-mode=2511' '--with-logdir=/var/log/dspam' '--sysconfdir=/etc' > 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions > -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic > -fasynchronous-unwind-tables' 'CXXFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall > -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector > --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic > -fasynchronous-unwind-tables' 'FFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall > -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector > --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic > -fasynchronous-unwind-tables' 'build_alias=i386-redhat-linux-gnu' > 'host_alias=i386-redhat-linux-gnu' 'target_alias=i386-redhat-linux-gnu' > > >Why did we have issues with your maintenance scripts waaay back when??? > > > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 5 >Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 11:46:31 -0700 >From: Terry Barnum <te...@dop.com> >Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] get rid of body tag? >To: Stevan Baji? <ste...@bajic.ch> >Cc: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net >Message-ID: <e1b39e46-0928-447d-afbb-7f44fda4d...@dop.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > >On Apr 5, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Stevan Baji? wrote: > >> Is this the whole output of "dspam --version"? You should get much more >> lines then the one you posted above. Can you post the whole output from >> "dspam --version"? > >Sorry, I just sent the version line. Here's the whole output: > >$ dspam --version > >DSPAM Anti-Spam Suite 3.9.0 (agent/library) > >Copyright (c) 2002-2009 DSPAM Project >http://dspam.sourceforge.net. > >DSPAM may be copied only under the terms of the GNU General Public License, >a copy of which can be found with the DSPAM distribution kit. > > >-Terry > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 6 >Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:53:08 +0200 >From: Stevan Baji? <ste...@bajic.ch> >Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] get rid of body tag? >To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net >Message-ID: <20100405205308.bc4c5dc8.ste...@bajic.ch> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > >On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 11:34:57 -0700 >Nathanael Noblet <nathan...@gnat.ca> wrote: > >> >> On Apr 5, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Nathanael Noblet wrote: >> > We should probably find out why that gets removed as if I remember >> > correctly the Fedora/EPEL versions have the same output... >> >> Well now this is odd... I just looked at it again... >> >> [r...@titanium bugs.gnat.ca]# dspam --version >> >> DSPAM Anti-Spam Suite 3.9.0 (agent/library) >> >> Copyright (c) 2002-2009 DSPAM Project >> http://dspam.sourceforge.net. >> >> DSPAM may be copied only under the terms of the GNU General Public License, >> a copy of which can be found with the DSPAM distribution kit. >> >> Configuration parameters: '--build=i386-redhat-linux-gnu' >> '--host=i386-redhat-linux-gnu' '--target=i386-redhat-linux-gnu' >> '--program-prefix=' '--prefix=/usr' '--exec-prefix=/usr' '--bindir=/usr/bin' >> '--sbindir=/usr/sbin' '--datadir=/usr/share' '--includedir=/usr/include' >> '--libdir=/usr/lib' '--libexecdir=/usr/libexec' '--localstatedir=/var' >> '--sharedstatedir=/usr/com' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' >> '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--enable-long-usernames' '--enable-syslog' >> '--enable-large-scale' '--disable-domain-scale' '--disable-homedir' >> '--enable-virtual-users' '--enable-preferences-extension' >> '--with-mysql-includes=/usr/include/mysql' >> '--with-mysql-libraries=/usr/lib/mysql' >> '--with-pgsql-includes=/usr/include/pgsql' '--with-pgsql-libraries=/usr/lib' >> '--enable-daemon' '--enable-external-lookup' >> '--with-storage-driver=hash_drv,mysql_drv,pgsql_drv,sqlite3_drv' >> '--with-dspam-home=/var/lib/dspam' '--with-dspam-owner=dspam' >> '--with-dspam-group=mail' '--with-dspam-home-group=mail' '--w > it >> h-dspam-mode=2511' '--with-logdir=/var/log/dspam' '--sysconfdir=/etc' >> 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions >> -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic >> -fasynchronous-unwind-tables' 'CXXFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall >> -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector >> --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic >> -fasynchronous-unwind-tables' 'FFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall >> -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector >> --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic >> -fasynchronous-unwind-tables' 'build_alias=i386-redhat-linux-gnu' >> 'host_alias=i386-redhat-linux-gnu' 'target_alias=i386-redhat-linux-gnu' >> >> >> Why did we have issues with your maintenance scripts waaay back when??? >> >I don't know. I only know that your system did not showed everything. If I am >not wrong then the *.la files are responsible to show that output. But I am >not 100% sure. > > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 7 >Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:56:56 +0200 >From: Stevan Baji? <ste...@bajic.ch> >Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] get rid of body tag? >To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net >Message-ID: <20100405205656.e9ff6583.ste...@bajic.ch> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > >On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 11:46:31 -0700 >Terry Barnum <te...@dop.com> wrote: > >> >> On Apr 5, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Stevan Baji? wrote: >> >> > Is this the whole output of "dspam --version"? You should get much more >> > lines then the one you posted above. Can you post the whole output from >> > "dspam --version"? >> >> Sorry, I just sent the version line. Here's the whole output: >> >> $ dspam --version >> >> DSPAM Anti-Spam Suite 3.9.0 (agent/library) >> >> Copyright (c) 2002-2009 DSPAM Project >> http://dspam.sourceforge.net. >> >> DSPAM may be copied only under the terms of the GNU General Public License, >> a copy of which can be found with the DSPAM distribution kit. >> >Is this really all you get? You should get much more things. Another way to >get the information needed is to post the compile options you have used. Can >you post the whole ./configure line you used when compiling DSPAM. Can you do >that? > > >> -Terry >> >-- >Kind Regards from Switzerland, > >Stevan Baji? > > > >------------------------------ > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > >------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Dspam-user mailing list >Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user > > >End of Dspam-user Digest, Vol 15, Issue 2 >***************************************** > >!DSPAM:22,4bba32fe55101791314475! > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
