On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:09:32 +0200 (CEST) "Edward P. Ross" <epr...@acrocat.com> wrote:
> > > > What Spam ratio? Do you mean Spam Hit Rate (SHR)? > > I was going off of the wording on the webui. > Aha. Okay. That 92.7% then just means that 92.7% of all his inbound mail is Spam. This is not a big issue. Just tells that this user gets a lot of Spam mails. > > I would say that TOE would not make much difference in your case with that > > low amount of data. At least not much (if at all). The user has less than > > 1000 processed messages. That is nothing. Probably you are using CHAIN as > > tokenizer (you almost have 1/4 FP/FN and that leads me to believe that you > > have one of the simpler/dull tokenizers (aka: WORD or CHAIN)). Right? > > Feature noise > Feature whitelist > Algorithm graham burton > Tokenizer osb > PValue bcr > Using what storage backend? -- Kind Regards from Switzerland, Stevan Bajić ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
