On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 04:15:25PM +0200, Stevan Baji?? wrote: > On Wed, 26 May 2010 06:49:44 -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht > <bradley.giesbre...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Most tokens are comming from the X-Greylist header. Would probably > >> be not bad to not check that header in DSPAM. > > > > Thanks for the tip. I have added "IgnoreHeader X-Greylist" to > > dspam.conf. Any other headers I should ignore? > > > You want my list? I ignore a lot of headers :) > > > > When I changed my tokenizer from chain to osb is there still value in > > the tokens created with the chain tokenizer? > > > No. You could delete them. They are useless with OSB. > Wouldn't the biGrams produced by the chain tokenizer be able to be used by the osb tokenizer, albeit with reduced accuracy? I am trying to figure out how bad the effect of changing the tokenizer would be because we would like to move to osb, but if the accuracy is reduced we may need to only add new users with osb.
Regards, Ken ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
