Thx a lot, Paul (and Stevan), for the time you spent explaining this,
I'll follow that steps and maybe shout for more help later!
My install is (gonna be) a postfix-powered, smtp relay to the regular
corporate mail server (coz this one is heavily loaded with IMAP
clients). I'm a coder (well, I hve my roots there at least), yes, with
average postfix skills, and it's better for everyone if I don't write
any documentation ;-)

Cyril'

Paul Cockings a écrit :
>
>> What MTA are you using? Maybe I could help to harden your setup? I
>> have so far helped two users from the DSPAM mailing list to harden
>> their setup and I would say that those little things have helped to
>> cut their Spam rate by factors.
>> @Marko Weber and Paul Cockings: If you are reading this... could you
>> post your experience with the hardened setup? I think Cyril could
>> benefit from some input.
>>
>>   
>
> Hey Cyril,
>
> Dspam is an awesome antispam-tool, but what Stevan has helped me with
> is to understand Dspam correctly and thats it best as a much large
> anti-spam toolkit.
> The big changes for me:
>
> Now using a merged group which was created from my own mailbox with a
> good balance of ham/spam. (i'm now working on ways to keep this
> auto-updated)
> Changed to OSB... Waaaay better than CHAIN (which I used for ~ 2 years).
> Adding a huge list of excluded headers to dspam.conf
>
> but the big change was not from Dspam, but from the other tools around
> it    The vast majority of spam never gets to Dspam now because it is
> blocked with tools like policy-weightd, greylist, spf checks etc.  
> policy-weightd has been extended with lots of tools like p0f (which OS
> sniffed from packets), Geo:IP (scores based on distance), DNSBL, S25R
> etc the list goes on.
>
> #                                       HIT score, MISS Score
>   @client_ip_eq_helo_score          = (1.5,       -1.25 );
>   @helo_score                       = (1.5,       -2    );
>   @helo_from_mx_eq_ip_score         = (1.5,       -3.1  );
>   @helo_numeric_score               = (2.5,        0    );
>   @from_match_regex_verified_helo   = (1,         -2    );
>   @from_match_regex_unverified_helo = (1.6,       -1.5  );
>   @from_match_regex_failed_helo     = (2.5,        0    );
>   @helo_seems_dialup                = (1.5,        0    );
>   @failed_helo_seems_dialup         = (2,          0    );
>   @helo_ip_in_client_subnet         = (0,         -1.2  );
>   @helo_ip_in_cl16_subnet           = (0,         -0.41 );
>   @client_seems_dialup_score        = (3.75,       0    );
>   @client_s25r_score                = (1.75,      -0.35 ); #
> http://gabacho.reto.jp/en/anti-spam/
>   @from_multiparted                 = (1.09,       0    );
>   @from_anon                        = (1.17,       0    );
>   @bogus_mx_score                   = (2.1,        0    );
>   @random_sender_score              = (0.25,       0    );
>   @rhsbl_penalty_score              = (3.1,        0    );
>   @enforce_dyndns_score             = (3,          0    );
>
>
> I to have ultra stupid users (i think we all do).  Today I had to
> explain to one user that email 'display name' and 'email address' are
> two different things, and someone the other day was asking the
> difference between Spam and Junk!!  -HeLp!
>
> I have some users that only use the web-ui for training - these people
> are technical.
> I have some users that just forward mail to retraining aliases
> I am now working on the old Outllook 2003 Addin so to give most of my
> users Spam/Ham buttons in outlook.
>
> You could also look at training from IMAP folders - depends on your
> setup and users.
>
> I will not waste my time with customers that will not take 2 mins of
> tutorial on how to use the Ham/Spam in outlook.  They deserve to get
> spam, but the truth is even if you don't train on my system the merged
> group is doing such a good job that those users seem to tolerate a
> small amount of spam.
>
> If you give a bit more information about your setup, I'm sure you'll
> find we are able to help.   IMO you don't want to be training for the
> end users, this eats a huge amount of time on your part.  Building a
> merged group and adding automatic ways to keep it updated is a much
> smarter way forward.
>
> BTW - are you coder or have any good skills with postfix? (other
> mtas?) or would you be willing to write up some howto's on the wiki or
> editing documentation?
>
> Kind regards
> from Middle England ('the shire') although i'm not a hobbit.
>
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Dspam-user mailing list
Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user

Reply via email to