Mark Dadgar wrote: > Given that history, I am expecting the upgrade to 3.9.0 to be PAINFUL. > O no! I want to give Dspam users warm fuzzy feelings! not painful!
Can you expand on PAINFUL for me? What when wrong in the past? I'd like to see all Dspam installation on 3.9.0 by the end of this year. There are too many custom setups out there and people scared to upgrade. If you spend some time now to upgrade, then future releases will be a breeze to install. Here is an idea... Create a VM and build a new RHEL install + Dspam from rpm. I'll happily give to write access to the wiki, then you have recorded your notes for next time ;-) The mailing list is here to help. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
