On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:08:26 +0200 "Edward P. Ross" <epr...@acrocat.com> wrote:
> I am not tied to procmail. It was there from the beginning and the > guide I used at the time > (http://dspamwiki.expass.de/Installation/Sendmail) had it that way. > > If there's no reason for me to use procmail, so I might as well just > have dspam handle it, right? > Wrong. DSPAM is not handling it. It is a LDA handling it. > So then I would use: > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > define('LOCAL_MAILER_PATH', `/usr/bin/dspam')dnl > define('LOCAL_MAILER_ARGS', `dspam "--deliver=innocent,spam" --user $u -d > %u')dnl > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > Right. > > now... > > Re: UntrustedDeliveryAgent > dspam binary is in /usr/bin. > > I have two copies of procmail, because I had to setuid it for it to work > w/ dspam, so icreated a new copy just for dspam. > So what do I want fo rthis: > > TrustedDeliveryAgent "/usr/local/bin/procmail.dspam" > UntrustedDeliveryAgent "/usr/local/bin/procmail.dspam -d %u" > Set this to (or wherever your sendmail binary is): TrustedDeliveryAgent "/usr/sbin/sendmail" UntrustedDeliveryAgent "/usr/sbin/sendmail" > > > > On 7/28/2010 9:57 PM, Stevan Bajić wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:42:04 +0200 > > news...@acrocat.com wrote: > > > >> Clarification on the response below: > >> > >> Should I change sendmail.mc to: > >> > >> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > >> define('LOCAL_MAILER_PATH', `/usr/local/bin/dspam')dnl > >> define('LOCAL_MAILER_ARGS', `dspam "--deliver=innocent,spam" --user > >> $u -d %u')dnl > >> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > >> > >> OR > >> > >> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > >> define(`LOCAL_MAILER_PATH', `/usr/local/bin/dspam')dnl > >> define(`LOCAL_MAILER_ARGS', `dspam -t -Y -a $h > >> "--deliver=innocent,spam" --user $u -d %u')dnl > >> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > >> > > I don't understand the question. The first one is if you DON'T use procmail > > as a delivery agent in DSPAM. The second is if you DO USE procmail as a > > delivery agent in DSPAM. > > > > > >> You had both... > >> and then dspam.conf gets changed from : > >> > >> TrustedDeliveryAgent "/usr/local/bin/procmail.dspam" > >> UntrustedDeliveryAgent "/usr/local/bin/procmail.dspam -d %u" > >> > >> to: > >> > >> TrustedDeliveryAgent "/usr/bin/dspam" > >> UntrustedDeliveryAgent "/usr/bin/dspam -d %u" > >> > >> But for UntrustedDeliveryAgent, what are the arguments for dspam? > >> > > What path do you use for DSPAM? Where is the binary located? In "/usr/bin/" > > or in "/usr/local/bin/"? In which one is the binary? > > > > > > > >> > >> > >> > >> On 7/28/2010 7:41 PM, Stevan Bajic' wrote: > >>>> Sendmail.mc: > >>>> ============================== > >>>> define(`LOCAL_MAILER_PATH', `/usr/bin/dspam')dnl > >>>> define(`LOCAL_MAILER_ARGS', `dspam -t -Y -a $h "--deliver=innocent" > >>>> --user $u -d %u')dnl > >>> If I am not wrong then those "-t", "-Y" and "-a" arguments are for > >>> procmail and you wrote to me that you are not using procmail. Right? If > >>> so then could you change the above to be: > >>> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > >>> define('LOCAL_MAILER_PATH', `/usr/local/bin/dspam')dnl > >>> define('LOCAL_MAILER_ARGS', `dspam "--deliver=innocent,spam" --user $u -d > >>> %u')dnl > >>> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > >>>> dspam.conf: > >>>> ============================== > >>>> TrustedDeliveryAgent "/usr/local/bin/procmail.dspam" > >>>> UntrustedDeliveryAgent "/usr/local/bin/procmail.dspam -d %u" > >>> What? So you are using procmail for delivery? Then the line above should > >>> be: > >>> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > >>> define(`LOCAL_MAILER_PATH', `/usr/local/bin/dspam')dnl > >>> define(`LOCAL_MAILER_ARGS', `dspam -t -Y -a $h "--deliver=innocent,spam" > >>> --user $u -d %u')dnl > >>> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > > !DSPAM:1,4c508bb8134868220693317! > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details: http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
