W dniu 30.07.2010 10:11, Stevan Bajić pisze: > nice to see you on the DSPAM mailing list. One Gentoo user (I have exchanged > mails with you in the past but over another email, but I think you know who I > am) more here :)
Of course i remeber you, but i'm suprised you remember me :) > To be honest: I think all that vacuum and reindex should go out of the purge > script for PostgreSQL. Would make things much easier if all what the purge > script does is to remove old tokens and leave it up to the DBA to choose when > and how and why to vacuum and reindex. To be honest...:) I thought that putting "reindex" and "vacuum" stem from expierience of many users collected through many years:) For me, reindex and vacuum are not necessary too. Regards, Marcin P.S. I got email from Alban Hertroys with CC to dspam-user list, but i can't see it. So i quote mail here: " I don't think the reindex is necessary at all. That's a corner-case operation that you shouldn't need in normal database operation. I don't see why dspam would need it, at best there'd be some high-volume scenarios where this turns out to be a gain, but for those cases you need custom solutions anyway. Alban Hertroys " ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details: http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
