Kurt Albershardt wrote: > On Aug 9, 2010, at 12:37 , Stevan Bajić wrote: > > >> I personally am avoiding to tweak any more on the WebUI. Mainly because over >> 18 months ago a lot of people have said that they will build a new WebUI >> (PHP based, etc) and and and... so I am for sure not now going to tweak any >> more something that anyway everyone and his dog wants to be replaced by a >> new WebUI. >> > > I remember that discussion, but have not been reading here for most of the > intervening time. Is there progress on that front? > > Err... no.
Lots of good intentions, but no one willing to commit time and skills. Those that know DSPAM a bit deeper see that it is too short sighted to call for just a 'new web-ui' as to make any significance functional gain of the existing perl/web-ui will require some deep thinking and a re-design of DSPAM. In the past I have been shouting for a new web-ui, but once i'd been educated in DSPAM I now see it makes no sense for just a new web-ui. The Web-ui is not held back by perl or any other language as is commonly misunderstood. We first need to rethink DSPAM, then the tools around DSPAM, then the web-ui would be trivial for a good developer. DSPAM badly needs more quality developers that can help from system design all the way to completion. If you are a good coder/developer type of chap (or chapess) and you are interested in DSPAM will really do need your help. Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
