On 08/03/2011 01:52 PM, Stevan Bajić wrote: > On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 12:54:28 -0600 > "Nathanael D. Noblet"<[email protected]> wrote: > >> One more question, which I'm fairly certain of, but thought I would ask >> anyway. This is a safe upgrade from 3.9 I presume? no changes to token >> system that would force a user to dump the db and re-train?... >> > Might I ask you why you are asking this? Is it because of the version number > jump from 3.9.x to 3.10.x? Or any other reason? > >
Just to be prudent. As the packager for fedora I wouldn't want to push an update that could change the underlying DB or tokenizer etc... I'm also partially lazy plus didn't really understand the release announcement when it said the upgrade should be problem free... No idea why. We just had a baby 2 weeks ago so I blame it on lack of sleep. Either way Fedora 16,15,14, EPEL 6,5 all have dspam 3.10 rolling in. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA The must-attend event for mobile developers. Connect with experts. Get tools for creating Super Apps. See the latest technologies. Sessions, hands-on labs, demos & much more. Register early & save! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-blackberry-1 _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
