Am 30.03.2012 16:16, schrieb Stevan Bajić:
>> Btw: For re-training: Is there some nice 'junk database' one could use
>> (for non-junk I can just use the current messages)? I know that when I
>> first installed DSPAM it took me quite a while to find such a junk
>> database -- but I forgot where it came from.
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/publiccorpus/
> http://plg.uwaterloo.ca/~gvcormac/treccorpus/
> http://plg.uwaterloo.ca/~gvcormac/treccorpus06/
> http://plg.uwaterloo.ca/~gvcormac/treccorpus07/

Thanks - this should be sufficient.


> Let me know if you need more.
> 
> If you want my advice: Don't use any pre training. It is almost useless.
> Switch to osb tokenizer and let the engine do the rest. You will see
> that you will very quickly (waaaay quicker than before) have already a
> score above 95%.
> 
> Or if you really want to do training then do it in conjunction with a
> merged global group and train that. But I would not train individual users.

Using a global group that knows about common spam-patterns was my
intention (as it is what I currently use).

>> And if I understand this correctly, I can drop any Preference thingy
>> that I don't want to be overridden by a user anyway?
> Not really. There are just a bunch of values that are available in both
> places. The one that are NOT preferences are used by the DSPAM
> agent/daemon while the other with the preference are used in the DSPAM
> client. Dropping them is not what you want (I guess).

Mhm. Now I'm puzzled ... how to I find out what preferences are used
where? And I still don't get what is the use to set an option like
'TrainingMode' and further have the Preference 'trainingMode=...'. Why
isn't it enough to have the global option and the AllowOverride?

As it seems like random to me whether a global option has a preference
counterpart and vice versa, it is quite hard to tell whether the option
you just changed is really changed or if there is some similary named
preference/option that overwrites it (and it does not get easier knowing
that client and server again only read some (undocumented?) subsets of it).

I'm more then happy to just get a RTFM :) (perhaps with a pointer to the
exact M).

- René

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________
Dspam-user mailing list
Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user

Reply via email to