Am 2012-08-16 16:44, schrieb Mauricio Tavares:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Stevan Bajić <ste...@bajic.ch> 
> wrote:
>> Am 2012-08-16 15:59, schrieb rodrigo tavares:
>>
[...]

>       By teaching it you mean giving it a directory full of spam and
> telling it "hey, this is spam" and then doing the same for ham?
>
Yes! Preferably you don't do this in serial but in parallel (aka: use 
dspam_train with a spam/ham corpus).


> I know I sound like I am talking about spamassassin but I hope you 
> get
> what I mean. =)
>>
I know perfectly what you mean and understand (or I think I understand) 
why you ask this. The point is however that from the beginning DSPAM is 
dumb and has no clue about Spam/Ham. You are the one who is teaching it 
and the more you teach it the better it gets. Actually the more you 
correct mistakes/errors DSPAM makes, the better it gets. It's not the 
quantity of data you process over DSPAM but the diversity/quality of the 
data and the accuracy of your re-training.



[...]


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Dspam-user mailing list
Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user

Reply via email to