On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:53:45AM -0700, David Rees wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:30 AM, k...@rice.edu <k...@rice.edu> wrote: > > You have just been whammied by the "TEFT-is-a-bad-bad-idea" problem. I > > suspect > > that if you look at the tokens involved, because of TEFT's constant > > storing/updating > > of tokens, you have very large counts. This means that you would need many, > > many > > retraining to make enough of a differenct to change its rating. You may > > want to > > try "innoculate" as that is a bit more aggressive. > > Thanks for the suggestion - the docs indicate that the source of > innoculation emails should be "pristine". Does that mean I should > manually remove any DSPAM headers from the email before sending it in > for innoculation? > > Is there a way to get debug information about what dspam is doing? > It's not obvious from the documentation I've read so far... > > -Dave >
Hi Dave, You can try enabling the "Add the factoring tokens in each email into the message's full headers" option in the DSPAM preferences. Also, if you have built the server with debugging enabled, try running it with the --debug option. Regards, Ken ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
