Am 2013-02-27 17:30, schrieb Chad M Stewart: > On Feb 27, 2013, at 7:38 AM, Stevan Bajić wrote: > >> It does not look like you have made anything incorrect. 91.5% >> accuracy >> slightly after the training phase is not bad. What tokenizer are you >> using? > > Tokenizer osb > > You just got recently out of training phase and 91% is not bad for that. The number will get soon higher. The reason for it to be around 90% slightly after the training period is that DSPAM was in a learning phase and it is normal to make errors in that phase. Later on this number will get higher and higher because DSPAM will (usually) make less errors and whitelisting will help to keep the FP rate lower. I would not break my head because of the 91%. Let DSPAM run for a bunch of days/weeks and if you then still have the feeling that it is not accurate enough then it's time to act. But not now.
> -Chad -- Kind Regards from Switzerland, Stevan Bajić ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
