Am 02.05.2014 19:06, schrieb Eric Shubert: > Just curious, are you using spamdyke (http://spamdyke.org)? IMO, > spamdyke is the best anti-spam software available. If I had to use only > one thing, it'd be spamdyke. Of course, I do use scanners as well as > spamdyke. Spamdyke rejects 80-90% of the spam up front though, so the > scanners have much less work to do. Your sever load will actually lessen > once it's installed. Win-win
forget it, spamdyke is crap not working generic and not useable in ISP like setups where you want to build up a gateway MTA based on postfix for incoming messages and route mail to different servers nor can i see any webinterface for users quarantine or bayesian filters - for RBL and smptd-restrictions you don't need anything more than postfix/postscreen >> I don't use qmail. Can I still use spamdyke? >> Not at this time WTF we have 2014 and SMTP is generic
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available. Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
