Hello List

We had a stable postfix+dspam+virtual mailbox setup running since over a year 
and one day it decided to start dropping all the incoming emails with:

ii  dspam                              3.10.2+dfsg-8                 amd64      
  Scalable, fast and statistical anti-spam filter
ii  postfix                            2.9.6-2                       amd64      
  High-performance mail transport agent

Dec 15 12:00:02 mailserver postfix/lmtp[2327]: C4F81800E6: 
to=<u...@ourcompany.com>, relay=mail.ourcompany.com[/var/run/dspam/dspam.sock], 
delay=0.58, delays=0.28/0.01/0/0.29, dsn=5.3.0, status=bounced (host 
mail.ourcompany.com[/var/run/dspam/dspam.sock] said: 530 5.3.0 
<u...@ourcompany.com> Fatal: 554 5.7.1 <u...@ourcompany.com>: Recipient address 
rejected: Access denied (in reply to end of DATA command))

We had around 200 virtual domains on that server and because of this strange 
error all of them was rejected. We did a workaround and disabled dspam.

Changing

virtual_transport = dspam:unix:/var/run/dspam/dspam.sock
to
virtual_transport = smtp:xx.xx.xx.xx:yyyyy

Now I try to investigate what caused a working system to get out of it's stance 
and go crazy at the middle of the day when it was running with the exact same 
config file 
over a year. When this happend we even restored the configs quickly from backup 
(which were the same) and rebooted the machine but it didn't help.


Any ideas are welcome.

Thanks

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Dspam-user mailing list
Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user

Reply via email to