Marco skrev den 2015-10-02 09:12:

> 2015-10-01T15:49:05.990363+02:00 server postfix/smtpd[21654]:
> 3nRbQn72BDzFpVZ: client=sedna.example.com[10.10.10.10]
> 2015-10-01T15:49:09.617588+02:00 server postfix/cleanup[21740]:
> 3nRbQn72BDzFpVZ: message-id=<>
> 2015-10-01T15:49:09.618820+02:00 server postfix/qmgr[20473]:
> 3nRbQn72BDzFpVZ: from=<ma...@example.com>, size=194, nrcpt=1 (queue
> active)
> 2015-10-01T15:49:09.675484+02:00 server postfix/pipe[21741]:
> 3nRbQn72BDzFpVZ: to=<ma...@example.com>, relay=dspam, delay=10,
> delays=10/0.01/0/0.05, dsn=5.3.0, status=bounced (Command died with
> status 251: "/usr/bin/dspam")
> 2015-10-01T15:49:09.738964+02:00 server postfix/bounce[21743]:
> 3nRbQn72BDzFpVZ: sender non-delivery notification: 3nRbQs4ntbzFpVd
> 2015-10-01T15:49:09.743448+02:00 server postfix/qmgr[20473]:
> 3nRbQn72BDzFpVZ: removed
> 
> Really, Postfix documentation says that filter with pipe can bounce
> instead to defer mails.
> This bounce occurs if dspam daemon die and dspam is configured in
> DLMTP client/server mode.
> I have not tried with "dspamc" in place of "dspam --client", but I
> think there are no differences.

possible is "loose end" here http://gentoo-en.vfose.ru/wiki/Dspam_relay

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Dspam-user mailing list
Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user

Reply via email to