Hello Kent,
I have the same problem.
And, I give up Dspam already. The result is not good, and the maintenance is
too difficult to deal with.
No one here can answer me the problem of re-learn...
I think Dspam got its good idea to handle spam, but it is not designed for
chinese.
Good luck
Patrick
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kent Tong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: [dspam-users] won't learn?
Marcin Krol wrote:
1. Try looking up the DSPAM factors in the message headers,
(you can view full message by pressing Ctrl-U in Thunderbird
or F9 in The Bat), the headers may give you some clue?
I just found out even for a spam correctly identified as spam, if
I classify it again, it will say it's innocent. If I delete the
headers generated by dspam (including the "Received by:" headers
it and Cyrus generated), then it will classify it as spam.
However, for a spam that wasn't identified, even after training it,
dspam is still classifying its header-removed version as innocent.
2. Have you changed the default spam-probability algorithms
in dspam.conf? You could tweak those and see what changes.
No.
--
Kent Tong
Useful news for CIO's at http://www2.cpttm.org.mo/cyberlab/cio-news
