Why do you want to have clustered setup if it is high availability you can have master/slave setup working on nfs while only one box would access the quarantine at the same time. If you want split trhe load you can do it on user/domain basis so half of the user has quarantine in one place on nfs and the other half in other and each box process only it's half.
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 22:11, Todd S. Florman wrote: > Jeff Palmer wrote: > >> If I were running dspam in daemon mode does anyone forsee contention > >> issues with files under that NFS mount? > >> > >> Thanks in advance, > >> > >> Todd Florman > > > > The data directory is stored in mbox format, which is not NFS safe. > > Until it is implemented as a Maildir format, it's not going to be > > possible to cluster dspam (easily) and still allow things like user > > quarantine. > > > > Jeff > > Jeff Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I completely forgot about the mbox/nfs situation, but you are most > certainly correct. Does anyone happen to have any innovative ideas > about per user quarantines in a clustered sort of setup, or am I stuck > using client/server mode with libdspam processing only occurring on a > single server. > > If anyone is running dspam across multiple servers, I would be > interested in knowing what you did or concessions you had to make to get > a working setup. > > Todd
