Actually disregard this sorry! I just noticed that without the -H is is correct. I thought it read "86 FP" but the 86 is coming from the TN: part. Sorry about that.
Ben wrote: > Hi, which is the correct way to run dspam_stats? Is it just dspam_stats > [EMAIL PROTECTED] or do I run dspam_stats -H [EMAIL PROTECTED] Example: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# dspam_stats -H [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > TP True Positives: 0 > TN True Negatives: 86 > FP False Positives: 0 > FN False Negatives: 0 > SC Spam Corpusfed: 0 > NC Nonspam Corpusfed: 0 > TL Training Left: 2414 > SHR Spam Hit Rate 100.00% > HSR Ham Strike Rate: 0.00% > OCA Overall Accuracy: 100.00% > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# dspam_stats [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > TP: 0 TN: 86 FP: 0 FN: 0 SC: 0 NC: 0 > > > Notice that when using -H, FP is 0, and without -H, FP is 86. What's > going on here? This is a new setup so it doesn't know what is spam and > what isn't, so it should treat them as true positives I guess. A true > positive is non-spam email, and a true negative means it's detected as > spam, is that right? >
