Tony Earnshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Elias Oltmanns skrev, on 02-06-2007 13:35:
>
>> I'm a very happy dspam user for some months now. Although I have never
>> consciously corpusfed anything to dspam but only trained it by means
>> of
>> dspamc ... --class=spam/innocent --source=error
>> commands, I noticed this yesterday:
>> $ sudo dspam_stats -H | grep SC
>>                 SC Spam Corpusfed:              5
>>
>> There had some emails to be retrained at the time but I simply do not
>> understand why anything should show up as corpusfed. On the other hand,
>> I might just have missed what corpus feeding was all about, so, if
>> anybody could enlighten me or have a suggestion as to how the matter
>> could be further investigated. This is on debian etch, i.e., dspam
>> 3.6.2.
>
> Indeed. This has been taken up earlier - also by me, perhaps Jonz's
> heirs (see his very recent posting) can shed some light.

Well, I can't find any recent posting by some Jonz Heirs. I did find
your posting describing a similar problem though. Yet, it seems there
has been no answer to it at the time.

>
> *OT*: As a Red Hat/Fedora user I have dspam 3.6.8 running on all my
> CentOS 5, RHAS4, Fedora FC6 systems, my own spec, no problems. A new
> boss has recently decreed that I learn Debian - it's taken me 3 weeks
> to find out how to CLI-install Sarge on a Compaq/HP Proliant ML150
> with 2 SATA discs, LVM and software RAID1 and almost no help in the
> firm. Sarge because a given customer wanted it, no Etch, no CentOS
> (CentOS was installed within an hour on the same machine, just to show
> hardware RAID was possible). I have an extremely negative attitude
> toward Debian at the moment, have to learn how to love it. What's your
> recipe? If necessary off list ;)

Experience, I suppose or, indeed, the lack of it. I don't know CentOS
and very little about Redhad products (just from helping out other
people with some general problems). The only distros I really do know
are SuSE in the olden days and several Debian based systems, so
Obviously, I'm slightly biased. Admittedly, though, its a long time
since I used plain sarge in any but really trivial environments.

Regards,

Elias

Reply via email to