Hm, i was hoping it was a setting somewhere :) But i feared the possibility of a bug as well.. Are you using 3.8 or 3.6.8 ( like me ). Otherwise, maybe 3.8 fixes this bug?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Aleksander Kamenik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 10:34:33 AM (GMT+0100) Europe/Berlin Subject: Re: [dspam-users] A few issues with DSPAM Bart Verwilst wrote: > TP True Positives: 18 > TN True Negatives: 8 > FP False Positives: 8 > FN False Negatives: 1 > SC Spam Corpusfed: 0 > NC Nonspam Corpusfed: 32 > TL Training Left: 2452 > SHR Spam Hit Rate 94.74% > HSR Ham Strike Rate: 50.00% > OCA Overall Accuracy: 74.29% > > How does he get the NC values? I never corpusfeed? I always forward to > notspam@ ... It did notice a FP correctly once though, while i'm sending to > the same address? That's a bug. I can show you stats like these: TP True Positives: 1150 TN True Negatives: 28970 FP False Positives: 86 FN False Negatives: 21526 SC Spam Corpusfed: 83597 NC Nonspam Corpusfed: 3 TL Training Left: 0 SHR Spam Hit Rate 5.07% HSR Ham Strike Rate: 0.30% OCA Overall Accuracy: 58.22% and TP True Positives: 29813 TN True Negatives: 9931 FP False Positives: 42 FN False Negatives: 9604 SC Spam Corpusfed: 27607 NC Nonspam Corpusfed: 18 TL Training Left: 0 SHR Spam Hit Rate 75.63% HSR Ham Strike Rate: 0.42% OCA Overall Accuracy: 80.47% and TP True Positives: 10426 TN True Negatives: 92994 FP False Positives: 50 FN False Negatives: 847 SC Spam Corpusfed: 40 NC Nonspam Corpusfed: 56 TL Training Left: 0 SHR Spam Hit Rate 92.49% HSR Ham Strike Rate: 0.05% OCA Overall Accuracy: 99.14% All come from the same install, different users. Not even one message has been ever corpusfed, spam nor ham. Ever! -- Aleksander Kamenik system administrator +372 6659 649 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Krediidiinfo AS http://www.krediidiinfo.ee/ !DSPAM:3,4680cedc228353282369210!
