On 8/10/07, Felix Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > SpamMePlease PleasePlease wrote: > > I am in the very same situation. In past days I have asked on amavisd > > lists how to force it or dspam to leave the headers but with no reply. > > Maybe here someone will know the answer? > > Can you explain your problem with more details?
Well, I have compiled dspam-devel from freebsd 6.2 ports tree (it is dspam-devel-3.8.0,1) and for me too it doesent leave ANY tags in message headers. No matter if I use it as content filter in Postfix, or if I use it via Amavisd functionality - maile are coming untouched. I am out of ideas - it sould work, and it works, beside not marking messages. The same, as in case few posts above. Any clues? > > And by the way, why there is > > so much silence on both sides when talkins about amavisd+dspam - is > > there any "war" or bad will among the projects? Both of them have > > *nothing* about connecting those two together in their respective > > docs... > > I don't think there is a 'war' or something. It's just that amavisd-new works > much better with SpamAssassin than it works with DSPAM. For example using > DSPAM > in amavisd-new you loose: > - the ability to use the DSPAM web frontend > - no body modifications for easy retraining > - the ability to have multiple DSPAM user profiles > - no ability to disable SpamAssassin > > Therefore I suspect that most amavisd-new users use SpamAssassin (which seem > to > be good enough for most) and don't care about DSPAM (including amavisd-new's > maintainer Mark Martinec who described the DSPAM support as experimental). On > the other hand most DSPAM users don't like to loose the features named above > so > they don't use amavisd-new or at least not DSPAM in amavisd-new. > > I wrote a patch which I'm using for some months on production servers which > makes DSPAM (sort of) a first class citizen in amavisd-new (e.g. you can use > DSPAM without SpamAssassin in amavisd-new, you get modified bodies and you can > have multiple DSPAM profiles). But it has some disadvantages so I didn't > publish > it widely. Could you please show us the patch? Maybe we all could do something to get those two AS bits working well together. Also, I have some questions about virtual users, as it is not perfectly clean in docs. In case of instalation for virtual users only, where data about their domains and logins is kept in database, and there is very big amount of accounts (about 10000) to have per-user database I will need to create two aliases for each account? Also, how big the database of dspam will be? After training of 2500 mails for single user the db is about 50mb. How all of this scale? Beside the fact, informing each of my users about the way how can he tune his spam filter is not very doable. Cant I have simple two [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] accounts/aliases? > > fs > Thanks for any reply! -- -------------------- Spank The Spam!
