> > So many groups and no clue which one/ which combination to use :( > What do you want to do? What is the goal you try to reach by using groups?
I want to migrate from Spamassassin to DSPAM in an ISP-environment. I have many Domains and multiple E-Mailaccounts per Domain. There are E-Mailaliases in a LDAP-Tree (I don't know if I can query the LDAP) The first goal is to provide an generic "out of the box" Filter which could be improved by user training. The next step is to use the LDAP information to maintain email aliases with one dictionary and quarantine (maybe shared,managed) I think a general (inoculation?) group per Domain improves the Spam-detection. And it should be maintainable with a frontend (not written yet). If I'm right with the above the new qeustions are: Is a global or merged group for the "out of the box" Filter better (performance?)? A user can't be member of shared and inoculation. Exists something like a managed, inoculation group? In general is a shared group or a combination inoculation/ classification the better choice? Is it possible (does it make sense) to nest groups like this: group1:global:user1,user2,user3 group2:inoculation:user1,user2 group3:classification:user1,user2,user3 > > Which combinations are succesful in use? > > Probably all of them. I can't mix shared and inoculation groups, so I can't use every combination :( regards Sven
