-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:53:08 -0700 > Von: Tom Bombadil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: [dspam-users] using --source=error without a signature
> Is there anyway to train a message when the signature is not present? > > basically I want to use: > dspam --class=spam --source=error > --source=error can only be used if DSPAM can reference the (error) tokens. So this only works with a previously processed message and a valid signature. If you want to train without signature, then you need to use another source then error. So only corpus or inoculation is left: dspam --class=spam --source=corpus dspam --class=spam --source=inoculation The problem with corpus or inoculation is that they are not designed for correcting misclassification. At least they don't offer a way to switch tokens from one class to the other (what error does). You could however train with corpus/inoculation in a loop for the correct class until the message processed results with the desired class. I would use corpus for forced training and inoculation for spam inbound on honeypots and/or for ham on outbound mail from your users. > If the signature is not present, the command above fails. > Yes. Error needs a reference and this reference is the DSPAM signature. Without the DSPAM signature you can not use error. > Cheers, > g. > cheers Steve -- GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 Free SMS. Alle Infos und kostenlose Anmeldung: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freemail
