On 9/27/07, Phil Wild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However, if I look at the dspam database, or the administrative tool, > I see each address being treated differently where I want them to be > the same. Are you suggesting aliases for the mail environmnet or some > alias within dspam.
You would need to get dspam to recognise addresses as being aliases, failing that, you would need to get dspam called as part of your local delivery processes, eg, maildrop or procmail etc, because those agents already know the correct location to deliver email. Tony Earnshaw suggested to me yesterday that integrating dspam into a different stage of the delivery process was the way to go, and I dismissed it at first thinking i'd like to stick with the default deployment of dspam, but the more i think about it, it looks to be the path of least resistence. Thanks Tony. > Interesting email address btw Too many lisa's in the gmail world, it was either that or "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" :-) Lisa.
