-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 13:58:08 +0100
> Von: Tony Earnshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: 
> CC: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] CVS version getting invalid result messages in logs

> Jason Axley skrev, on 31-12-2007 22:34:
> 
> > I've got the latest CVS version built on ubuntu and it seems to be
> > better than the 3.8.0 version at telling me there is an error
> > encountered instead of failing to completely tag messages it chokes on. 
> > Several messages slipped through and I see this in the mail.log:
> > 
> > Dec 31 10:15:53 void dspam[12984]: bailing on error -2
> > Dec 31 10:15:53 void dspam[12984]: received invalid result (! DSR_ISSPAM
> > || DSR_INNOCENT) : -2
> > Dec 31 10:15:53 void dspam[12984]: process_message returned error -2. 
> > delivering.
> > 
> > Anyone seen this or have an idea offhand why dspam might error on this? 
> > I'm using the mysql driver along with this group config:
> > 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:merged:*
> > global-classification:classification:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > The messages it failed on were really simple, short
> > multipart/alternative messages with just a plaintext and html version.
> 
> I can't comment on the group config since I run a shared group, but yes, 
> I've had the above in a situation with CVS where another process was 
> holding onto dspam running as daemon. Nor do I run Ubuntu, I run FC6.
> 
> BTW on my rigs I don't suppose it would be possible for the new, 
> patched, code to do any better than straight 3.8.0, since nothing 
> affects Jonz' math portion.
>
It is easy to affect the accuracy without touching the math portion of the 
tokenizer and/or the probability calculation. I am running over here a setup 
where I have not changed the math portion of the code but changed the storage 
part and I am getting higher accuracy because of the change. If you want, then 
I can easy explain why that is. Just let me know...


> I'm already getting way above 99% for all 
> spam recognition on both home and production machines, with way less 
> than 0.5% false positives.
> 
This is pretty normal with the underlaying math part in DSPAM. CRM114 or 
OSBF-Lua can top that easily.


> Fine 2008 to all.
> 
To you too.


> --Tonni
> 
Steve

> -- 
> Tony Earnshaw
> Email: tonni at hetnet dot nl

-- 
GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 Free SMS.
Alle Infos und kostenlose Anmeldung: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freemail

Reply via email to