Steve wrote:
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 08:48:47 -0500
Von: Troy Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] How to force whitelisting ?
- Full email address matching ( IE "Joe Schmoe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> )
You really want RFC822 style address format syntax checks? Would RFC821 style address format syntax not
be enough (aka: [EMAIL PROTECTED])? I ask because most users will probably know "[EMAIL
PROTECTED]" to be the address to whitelist and not the full RFC822 address "Joe Schmoe"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. However.... the RFC821 style address format syntax would match a full blown
RFC822 address but not the other way around.
- Option to match on from address and/or "Reply-to:" address.
Per entered whitelist address?
- Administratively managed per user whitelist
So one admin is managing a users whitelist? This is different then the other
request from a ML member where each user is managing only his own list.
I do not see the merit of adding this (admin managed whitelist)
functionality to dspam. There are plenty of tools out there already do
this so that one could whitelist globally and avoid running the said
mail through dspam altogether. IMHO the single most advantageous
function in dspam that would justify adding a manual whitelist function
would only be if it were per user and managed by the user, something
that dspam does exceptionally well already with the present auto
whitelist function.
- No user managed whitelist.
See above.
- No global whitelist.
See above.
- dspam gui displays whitelisted emails.
In a different way then the automatic whitelisted addresses? Currently
whitelisted entries are shown in violet color in the DSPAM Web UI. Do you want
the mails matching the manual entered email whitelist addresses to be
colored/tagged differently in the Web UI?
-Troy
// Steve
!DSPAM:1011,48766413150922117551757!
