Thank you all for you reply and comments.
Let me make myself clearer. 
I would like to see the audio quality of D-Star be improved. To MY ears' 
everyone sound like a robot. I thought this was due to the low bit rate. I am 
NOT impressed with the digital voice mode. I want to hear a more natural 
sounding voice. My telephone sounds better.
How could this be achieved if not by bit rate?
John
====================================================

--- In [email protected], "Ted Wrobel" <twro...@...> wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>  
> Not quite sure what you are thinking, but here is a brief overview of the
> DStar data stream.
>  
> The input to / output from the data processing 'module' of the radio is a
> 9600 Baud stream - which equates to roughly 960 eight bit characters per
> second.
>  
> The logic of the system digitizes the voice in and passes it to the AMBE
> Vocoder that compresses the data stream - a lot.
>  
> It is the compresion by the Vocoder that is both the strength and weakness
> of DStar. The compression makes a low data rate (and thus low bandwidth)
> possible, but it also means that the re-constituted voice is an
> approximation of the voice input. Generally the reconstructed voice is
> pretty good, and given the bandwidth it is really quite remarkable.
>  
> In any case, the baud rate of the system is fixed and cannot be modified at
> any stage of the process without making the resulting stream unrecognizable
> to other DStar systems.
>  
> Note that the data rate over the internet can be much higher, but the chain
> from repeater controller to / from the radio is fixed for DV comms at 9600.
> 
> 
> 73
> Ted
> W1GRI
>  
>   _____  
> 
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of n2gyn
> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 16:54
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Bit Rate?
> 
> 
>   
> 
> Most radios are sent to 8bit. Can all radio's bit rate be changed?
> I believe it is the LOW bit rate that lowers the quality of d-star's audio.
> Is there a sub menu in the radio's. Also can the repeater's rate be change
> to a higher rate?
> John
>


Reply via email to