Adam, I think I could use dtrace -h I just would like to avoid doing so because of the hoops I believe I will have to go through to get the libtool stuff to work. I just thought I would ask before going on the adventure of getting the Makefiles to work.
thanks, --td > You could just kludge it up by using the same > generated names. Is there a > reason you can't use dtrace -h? > > Adam > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 07:25:53AM -0700, Terry > Dontje wrote: > > I think I know the answer to the following but it > is causing me headaches in changing my makefiles and > such. > > > > Is there a way to access the is-enabled > functionality without having to generate a header > file for the probes (that is without doing "dtrace > -h...")? I assume the answer is no (unless you want > to hack the dtrace generated names into the code > which I would imagine is not kindly looked upon). > > > > thanks, > > > > --td > > > > > > -- > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > > _______________________________________________ > > dtrace-discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > -- > Adam Leventhal, FishWorks > http://blogs.sun.com/ahl > ________________________ > dtrace-discuss mailing list > [email protected] -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ dtrace-discuss mailing list [email protected]
