Bruce,
I know it is not elegant but I run iostat -xDn 30 and if I see
wsvc_t time then I assume that sd_max_throttle
is hurting me.
rick

On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 02:03:54PM +0000, Bruce McAlister wrote:
> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:03:54 +0000
> From: Bruce McAlister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [dtrace-discuss] sd_max_throttle
> In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [email protected]
> Errors-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Complaints-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Precedence: list
> X-BeenThere: [email protected]
> Delivered-to: [email protected]
> X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296
> X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on
>       oss-mail1.opensolaris.org
> X-Original-To: [email protected]
> X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
> X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.100.145.104
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
> List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
> List-Subscribe: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/dtrace-discuss>,
>       <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> List-Unsubscribe:
>  <http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/dtrace-discuss>,
>       <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> List-Archive: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/dtrace-discuss>
> List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> List-Id: DTrace General Discussion <dtrace-discuss.opensolaris.org>
> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no
>       version=3.2.3
> X-Spam-Level: **
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > we are using hardware array and its vendor recommends the following setting 
> > in
> > /etc/system:
> > set sd:sd_max_throttle = <value>
> > or
> > set ssd:ssd_max_throttle = <value>
> > 
> 
> To find out a little more of what this feature does, have a read here:
> 
> http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=12523&tstart=0
> 
> > 
> > Is it possible to monitor *somehow* whether the variable becomes
> > sort of bottleneck ? Or how its value influences io traffic ?
> > 
> 
> You could probably monitor the performance using the standard tools, for
> example, iostat.
> 
> What you are doing when you set these commands is effectivly limiting
> the total number of io requests to a particular device. This is
> "recommended" with arrays because they share out multiple "luns" over a
> single port and thus the number of io requests from the hosts may
> overwhelm the FEP.
> 
> > Regards
> > przemol
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dtrace-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]

-- 

Rickey C. Weisner 
Software Development and Performance Specialist 
Sun Microsystems, INC
cell phone: 615-308-1147
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
dtrace-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to