On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 03:03:15PM -0600, Spencer Shepler wrote: > Given that these protocol mechanisms will exist at client and > server, it would be helpful to have a naming mechanism that > differentiated this fact.
Perhaps the module name could be used as the differentiator? nfsv4:client::op-<op> nfsv4:server::op-<op> > I also assume that when NFSv4.1 > is introduced that the provider will be expanded to something > like: > > nfsv41:::op-access-start ACCESS4args * > ... Does 4.1 differ so much from 4 that the provider name itself must differ? _______________________________________________ dtrace-discuss mailing list [email protected]
