Adam, again our views are different. Must be our heritage ;^)
Why was this header file creation invented given that the manual, in the chapter of statically defined probes for applications, only mentions the macro's DTRACE_PROBExxx? I have the impression that the "misunderstanding" starts with allowing the hyphen in probe names: are there any other programming or scripting languages that allow a math symbol in a variable name? But ala that decision has been made. "It would be tricky to..." is your final remark. Could you elaborate a little here, since the core part of the code is working as Trond also pointed out. It is just the "religions" "One underscore looks better in macros" vs "Do not translate in an irreversable way" My first hunch would be the following: by default stick to the current behaviour. I that irreversable way is not wanted use an option (yet another one) with dtrace that "just" translates the macro names keeping double underscores in place. Am I missing something? Thanks Paul -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ dtrace-discuss mailing list [email protected]
