Andrew Gallatin writes: > Just that that the second snippet seems to be rather > recursive (this->mp = this->mp->b_cont) and it seems > to work, and is a nice alternative to enumerating > all the potential chains as was suggested. > > Maybe I'm thinking of things incorrectly..
It's not recursive; it's sequential. The instructions are executed in the order they appear. There are no places where it jumps "backwards" or reconsiders an earlier probe point based on what a later one says. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ dtrace-discuss mailing list [email protected]
