> you don't mind, try that out and let us know how it > then compares to > prstat -m.
The changes seem to track prstat more closely, now (e.g. sleep, running, ...). Thanks for the update. On the down side, the process I was observing had LAT (from prstat) in the 0-2% range, but I never saw "waitcpu" (from pfilestat) go above 0[1]. Also, I noticed sleep times in the 101-103% range a few times as well. Don't know if you want to pursue this any further[1], but let me know if you need any more info. Bob [1] I won't have access to the "test" system for the rest of the day, so I wasn't able to experiment with trying to drive the LAT values any higher to see if waitcpu would register (> 0). -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ dtrace-discuss mailing list [email protected]
