On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 02:11:09PM -0700, Anatoli wrote:
> Many thanks to all!
> I have not read about arg2 as a *continuation* of arg1 in the doc (may be
> just missed the note...)
> And if it is not there - should it be mentioned as well ?
> PS: the whole number may be converted back as:
> dtrace -n "pid`pgrep
> gettimeofday`::ret_ll:return{trace(arg2*0x100000000ULL+arg1)}"
Only on x86; on sparc, you'd have to swap arg2 and arg1.
Cheers,
- jonathan
_______________________________________________
dtrace-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
