> Yes, exactly, but our ld (GNU) seems to remove the .SUWN_dof section.. I'm > writing code to add the section using libelf. Also, our ld ignores SUNW_dof > section types, so I'm using SHT_PROGBITS as an interim solution (drti.c needs > changes for this to work).
We've modified our linker to understand the new section. Would it be reasonable to do the same for GNU ld? Do you have a suggestion for how we might have designed the interaction between DTrace and the linker differently? Adam -- Adam Leventhal, Fishworks http://blogs.sun.com/ahl _______________________________________________ dtrace-discuss mailing list dtrace-discuss@opensolaris.org
