Christopher Saul wrote: >Would using a proxy server make more sense? > > > Hmm.. i don't think so..
>That way you could control web access and leave DNS to resolving >internal addresses to the mail and file server, etc? > > > I think the easiest is to setup a DHCP server (Dynamic updates ) (if n/w is large) and let DHCP manage it. I have for example a staticallly allocated pool as well as dynamically allocated pool. If the DHCP server is on a different machine then this situation is a bit tricky but one can use key for authentication in that case, but only thing is that it is one more step ahead. The normal users can use the dynamic pool, whereas it would be advisable to use the static pool for the servers. When you have dynamic updates enabled (i use: ddns-update-style interim; for dynamic updates) it will adjust the entris in the hosts journal. which would be completely hassle free. Manu ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery. http://us.click.yahoo.com/.QUssC/izNLAA/TtwFAA/0XFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dubailug/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
