Brad Campbell wrote:
> 
> 
> Manu Abraham wrote:
>> Brad Campbell wrote:
> 
>>> Actually, while asking that question I wonder.. why does nobody poke fun
>>> at me except Dan?
>>
>>
>> Maybe it is due to the lack of 16APSK/32APSK reception.
>>
> 
> Are you suggesting I switch to QPSK and cater to the lowest common
> denominator?


At some point, looking at the lowest common denominator would be nice at
least for reliable transmission of the Pilot tones, hence Pilot tones
are usually transmitted at Pie/2 BPSK

But again as advised usually, any higher level modulation/protocol
should probably have a fallback.


> What about if I broadcast 4 streams at once modulated in each various
> compliant method to ensure
> maximum reception compatibility by the masses? But what then do I
> advertise my reception
> capabilities as and how do we negotiate?


Inherent simplicity at base protocols is usually tried for negotiations,
rather than a complex conjugate of the higher order protocols. Again 4
streams is nothing, as it is just normal multiplexing, normally we can
do a lot , but just limited by Shannon's theorem.


> 
> Brad (This post raises far more questions than it answers I'm afraid)
> -- 
> "Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability
> to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable
> for their apparent disinclination to do so." -- Douglas Adams
> 


MA


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dubailug/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dubailug/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to