On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Dave Borowitz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Awesome! If, while you're at it, you managed to get rid of > _LengthLimitedFile, at least for the gzipped case, that would be cool too. I looked over this class, and I'm assuming it's to conform to this part of th WSGI spec [1]? According to my reading of the spec, this behavior isn't strictly required. It's neighborly to do it, though. I'm not sure how handling it in the gzipped case would work. Would you want to move the content-length logic from handle_service_request to the gzip middleware? Otherwise we'd have a leaky abstraction to figure out if it had already been handled or not. 1. http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3333/#handling-the-content-length-header _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dulwich-users Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dulwich-users More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
