Sounds good to me. On 11:14 Sat 08 Jun , Jeremy Whitlock wrote: > +1 > > On Saturday, June 8, 2013, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > > (CC'ing dulwich-users) > > > > Hi there, > > > > You're receiving this email because you are one of the contributors to > > Dulwich (http://samba.org/~jelmer/dulwich/). > > > > The current license of Dulwich is GPLv2 or later. I would like to > > change that to version 2.0 of the Apache license for the following > > reasons: > > > > * Several permissively licensed projects that use Dulwich or > > want to use Dulwich have indicated that the GPL is a problem > > for them. > > > > * More consistent with other modules in the Python world and Python > > itself, where permissive licenses are common > > > > Since the Apache2 license is incompatible with the GPLv2 > > (it is compatible with GPL version 3.0), we would have to dual-license > > under GPLv2 and Apache v2 license - to keep projects that depend on > > Dulwich and are GPLv2 licensed happy. > > > > Please let me know what your thoughts are on relicensing, if you're > > okay to see your contribution to Dulwich available under Apachev2 license > > or if you have any questions. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Jelmer > >
-- milki _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dulwich-users Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dulwich-users More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
