THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added:
FS#124 - test the IsothermalImmiscibleFluidState User who did this - Benjamin Faigle (Benjamin) ---------- I am sorry to disagree, but in that lengthy discussion it was also concluded that FluidStates that do not match Andreas' definition of a general fluid state by requiring special (and possibly unique to the model) thermodynamic properties or being anyway else "different" should remain independent and model-specific. That is why there is no genericfluidstate any more. But you are right, especially in the case of the DecoupledTwoPTwoCFluidState, way more should be inherited from the fully-implicit fluid states, and the API should converge more. By reorganizing the whole decoupled models, I just did not manage to work that out for the last release. ---------- More information can be found at the following URL: http://www.dumux.org/flyspray/index.php?do=details&task_id=124#comment141 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above. _______________________________________________ Dumux mailing list [email protected] https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
